Ebook Free Assholes: A Theory, by Aaron James
After downloading the soft file of this Assholes: A Theory, By Aaron James, you can start to read it. Yeah, this is so pleasurable while someone needs to check out by taking their large publications; you are in your new means by only handle your device. Or even you are working in the office; you can still make use of the computer system to read Assholes: A Theory, By Aaron James fully. Of course, it will certainly not obligate you to take lots of pages. Just page by web page depending on the moment that you need to read Assholes: A Theory, By Aaron James
Assholes: A Theory, by Aaron James
Ebook Free Assholes: A Theory, by Aaron James
When you are hurried of job deadline as well as have no suggestion to get inspiration, Assholes: A Theory, By Aaron James publication is among your remedies to take. Reserve Assholes: A Theory, By Aaron James will provide you the ideal source and thing to obtain motivations. It is not just regarding the works for politic business, administration, economics, and also various other. Some ordered tasks making some fiction jobs likewise need inspirations to overcome the work. As just what you need, this Assholes: A Theory, By Aaron James will probably be your choice.
As one of the book collections to propose, this Assholes: A Theory, By Aaron James has some solid factors for you to check out. This book is very ideal with exactly what you require now. Besides, you will certainly additionally like this book Assholes: A Theory, By Aaron James to review considering that this is among your referred publications to read. When going to get something brand-new based upon encounter, enjoyment, and other lesson, you can utilize this publication Assholes: A Theory, By Aaron James as the bridge. Beginning to have reading practice can be undertaken from numerous ways and also from alternative kinds of books
In checking out Assholes: A Theory, By Aaron James, currently you might not also do traditionally. In this contemporary age, device as well as computer system will certainly aid you so much. This is the time for you to open the gizmo as well as remain in this site. It is the best doing. You could see the connect to download this Assholes: A Theory, By Aaron James right here, can't you? Just click the link as well as make a deal to download it. You could reach acquire guide Assholes: A Theory, By Aaron James by on the internet as well as prepared to download. It is very different with the standard method by gong to the book store around your city.
However, checking out guide Assholes: A Theory, By Aaron James in this website will lead you not to bring the published publication almost everywhere you go. Simply keep the book in MMC or computer system disk and also they are readily available to check out any time. The prosperous system by reading this soft documents of the Assholes: A Theory, By Aaron James can be introduced something brand-new practice. So currently, this is time to confirm if reading can improve your life or otherwise. Make Assholes: A Theory, By Aaron James it certainly work and get all benefits.
In the spirit of the mega-selling On Bullshit, philosopher Aaron James presents a theory of the asshole that is both intellectually provocative and existentially necessary.
What does it mean for someone to be an asshole? The answer is not obvious, despite the fact that we are often personally stuck dealing with people for whom there is no better name. Try as we might to avoid them, assholes are found everywhere—at work, at home, on the road, and in the public sphere. Encountering one causes great difficulty and personal strain, especially because we often cannot understand why exactly someone should be acting like that.
Asshole management begins with asshole understanding. Much as Machiavelli illuminated political strategy for princes, this book finally gives us the concepts to think or say why assholes disturb us so, and explains why such people seem part of the human social condition, especially in an age of raging narcissism and unbridled capitalism. These concepts are also practically useful, as understanding the asshole we are stuck with helps us think constructively about how to handle problems he (and they are mostly all men) presents. We get a better sense of when the asshole is best resisted, and when he is best ignored—a better sense of what is, and what is not, worth fighting for.
- Sales Rank: #90786 in eBooks
- Published on: 2012-10-30
- Released on: 2012-10-30
- Format: Kindle eBook
From Booklist
Hot on the heels of Geoffrey Nunberg’s Ascent of the A-Word (2012) comes another discussion of assholes and what to do about them. Actually, that’s a bit too glib: James, a philosophy professor, takes a slightly different approach than Nunberg. Where Nunberg focused on the history of assholism (with side trips into such subjects as the difficulties in writing about assholes without censorship), James proposes a theory of assholes (a person is an asshole when his sense of entitlement makes him immune to complaints from other people) that explains not only why assholes are a vital part of human society, but also how to recognize them and coexist with them. The author addresses some fundamental questions—such as whether assholes are born or made, a sort of nature-versus-nurture debate for the asshole crowd—and rigorously avoids what must have been a strong temptation to go for the cheap laugh (although it must be pointed out that this is definitely a lighter book than Nunberg’s more academic study). --David Pitt
Review
“Convincing and often quite funny. . . . James neatly unpacks the basic features of the most loathsome individual. . . .�[He] makes a rigorous case for why we should take the problem of the asshole seriously.”
—Los Angeles Review of Books
“James’s keen intelligence overwhelms you, and you realize that Assholes is helpful, stimulating, and very timely.”
—Nick Hornby, The Believer
�
“Enjoyable. . . . Light-hearted yet thought-provoking. . . . Importantly, [James makes] us confront a crucial question, which, I believe, we ask ourselves all too infrequently: How much of an asshole am I?”
—Alex Balk, Slate
“James neatly does what philosophers must do: he defines his terms, organizes and codifies, declares his own loyalties; he locates himself on the spectrum of assholery and suggest origins both psychological and sociological. The result is a delightful combination of the demotic and the technical.”
—Harper’s Magazine
“James’s volume is equal parts philosophical meditation and historical survey, but its true value lies in his attempt to precisely define the term.”
—New York Magazine
“The times are right for a follow-up [to Frankfurt’s On Bullshit]. . . . James’s volume is in roughly equal parts a philosophical meditation, a pop historical survey and a practical guide to negotiate the treacherous rectal waters in which we swim; but, its true value lies in his attempt to define the term precisely. . . . In Assholes, he is doing more than poking fun at all the people we like to despise.”
—The Innovation Journal
“Intriguing. . . . To put meat on the bones of his theory, James names names.”
—The Chronicle of Higher Education
“Aaron James provides us with a delightful philosophical romp through the world of assholes. I was especially tickled by his analysis of different types: smug assholes, royal assholes, the presidential asshole, corporate assholes, the reckless assholes, to name a few.”
—Robert I. Sutton, Stanford professor and author of the New York Times bestsellers The No Asshole Rule and Good Boss, Bad Boss
“[James’s] witty and accessible study of the personal and social problems the asshole creates draws on his lucid and brilliant accounts of the best in contemporary moral and political philosophy. James’s analysis of asshole capitalism is a tour de force of philosophically astute political analysis and criticism. This is a book that should appeal equally to the general reader and the philosophical specialist.”
—Marshall Cohen, founding editor of Philosophy and Public Affairs and university professor emeritus, University of Southern California
“A serious and sometimes whimsical treatment of a common epithet.”
—Publishers Weekly
“James’ research is both thorough and imaginative; his impressive source list ranges from obscure philosophy books to popular websites to Rudyard Kipling to Kanye West, hip-hop’s greatest asshole. The author’s enthusiasm for the subject makes it possible to get through the book quickly. . . . There are moments of great insight and outright hilarity.”
—Kirkus Reviews
“Convincing. . . . It is in his chapter ‘Asshole Capitalism’ where James hits his stride.”
—Maclean’s (Toronto)
“Persuasive. . . . The thrust of James’s thesis is timely. . . . Energetically argued and provoking.”
—Literary Review (UK)
About the Author
Aaron James holds a PhD from Harvard and is Professor of Philosophy at the University of California, Irvine. He is the author of Fairness in Practice: A Social Contract for a Global Economy, and was awarded the Burkhardt Fellowship from the American Council of Learned Societies, spending the 2009-10 academic year at the Center for Advanced Study in the Behavioral Sciences at Stanford University. He’s an avid surfer (the experience of which has directly inspired this book) . . . and he’s not an asshole.
Most helpful customer reviews
205 of 223 people found the following review helpful.
Naming names: a philosopher's view of [censored]
By TChris
[Apparently the robotic censors that patrol the reviews will not allow a review to post that actually uses the title of this book. This review will therefore use A-holes to represent the book's title, and a-hole to refer to the singular form of that word.]
Aaron James took a break from the philosopher's customary search for the meaning of life to ponder a more burning question: What does it mean to be an a-hole? I have the sense that James wrote A-holes so he could share his complaints about surfers who behave like a-holes, particularly Brazilians. Whatever his motivation, and despite his earnest attempt to subject a-holes to scholarly thought, much of A-holes is enjoyable simply because the topic is so appealing. Everyone, after all, has an opinion about a-holes.
A-holes consistently cut in line, interrupt, and engage in name-calling. They do not play well with others (in James' language, they are not fully cooperative members of society). Many (perhaps most) people occasionally behave like an a-hole without becoming an a-hole. As a theory of the a-hole, James posits that an a-hole is a person who enjoys "special advantages in interpersonal relations out of an entrenched sense of entitlement that immunizes him against the complaints of other people." Although I think "a-hole" is pretty much self-defining, in the sense of "I know one when I see one," I like James' definition. I think it's a definition rather than a theory, but I'm probably just quibbling about semantics (which is pretty much the philosopher's job description, making it a battle I can't win). Whether it is a theory or a definition, after he finishes parsing it, James politely suggests that it is up to the reader to decide whether to agree with it. James is plainly no a-hole.
James tells us that a-holes are morally repugnant but not truly evil. If you're interested in standard philosophical discussions of moral behavior and moral responsibility with references to the likes of Aristotle, Kant, and Buber, you'll find them here. Those of us who needed strong coffee to make it through our philosophy classes are probably hoping for something more fun than a rehash of Martin Buber in a book titled A-holes. We're looking for the author to name names. Happily, James does so (although not without some preliminary hand-wringing about whether calling out a-holes is something only an a-hole would do). From Simon Cowell to Mel Gibson, from Donald Trump to Steve Jobs, from Ann Coulter to Bill O'Reilly, James finds a-holes in every walk of life. James even suggests that book reviewers can be a-holes (oh my!) although he does so in the context of academia.
Consistent with his definitional/taxonomic approach, James classifies a-holes by type, including the boorish a-hole (Rush Limbaugh, Michael Moore), the smug a-hole (Richard Dawkins, Larry Summers), the a-hole boss (Naomi Campbell), the presidential a-hole (Hugo Chavez), the reckless a-hole (Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld), the self-aggrandizing a-hole (Ralph Nader), the cable news a-hole (Neil Cavuto, Keith Olbermann), and the delusional a-hole (Kanye West, Wall Street bankers). James covers the spectrum from liberals to conservatives in his search for a-holes and applies his test with, I think, a nonpartisan outlook. Of course, some readers will be displeased that he has called a political favorite an a-hole, but again, James rather politely invites disagreement and urges readers to apply the test as they see fit.
James' approach to categorization lends itself to party games. You can make up categories James overlooked, like the sports a-hole (George Steinbrenner, Michael Vick), or you can add names to the categories he's invented. Don't worry, there are plenty more a-holes identified in the book -- the names I've cherry-picked are illustrative only -- as well as some categories I haven't mentioned, but you'll easily think of more. The book is short and the world is filled with a-holes.
Returning to the realm of philosophy, James considers whether a-holes are morally responsible for being a-holes, which leads to a discussion of whether a-holes have free will. James' conclusion is at odds with the answer you would get from a neuroscientist like Bruce Hood, but whether you blame a-holes or accept that they can't help being who they are, you're still stuck with them. James reasons that a-holes are generally male because they are shaped by the culture of gender, although I think he puts too fine a point on it when he draws subtle distinctions between a-holes and beetches (another word I altered to avoid the censor, but you know what I mean). I also think he's a bit naive when he argues that, for cultural reasons, American men are more likely to be a-holes than Japanese men, a proposition with which many Southeast Asians (not to mention the surviving residents of Nanking) would disagree.
James includes a chapter on how to manage a-holes (short version: you really can't, but you can try to make yourself feel good) and a chapter that suggests how capitalist societies (which encourage the sense of entitlement on which a-holes thrive) can deteriorate when the a-hole ethic takes root (short version: greed isn't good, Gordon Gecko notwithstanding). The concluding chapter tells us how to find a peaceful life in a world full of a-holes (short version: reconcile yourself to the things you cannot change while hoping for a better world). These chapters give James a chance to apply the thoughts of Plato and St. Augustine and the Stoics and Rousseau and even Jesus to the topic of a-holes. Heavy thinkers will probably enjoy those discussions. Lightweight thinkers, like me, will enjoy the name naming while looking forward to the party games the book inspires.
87 of 96 people found the following review helpful.
Breezy but insightful
By GRiM
First, this book is really funny. It's quite a page turner for a philosophy text, even a mass market philosophy text. Of course, the frequent repetition of the word a-hole appeals to those of us with a low sense of humor.
Dr. James begins by attempting a definition of the a-hole. He then, amusingly, names a variety of people he considers a-holes in public life. While Dr. James is a self-described liberal, he's pretty even-handed in apportioning a-holiness to the left and right. (He reserves particular distaste for Fox News, which he regards as the "gold standard" of a-holiness; desipte being a conservative myself, I find it very hard to disagree with him). He goes on to offer classifications of various types of a-holes.
The later chapters are more philosophical. He inquires, for example, why a-holes tend to be male, and why they tend to be produced more frequently in some cultures rather than others. For example, he considers Italy, Israel, Brazil and the US to be particularly prone to a-hole generation, while regarding Japan as almost incapable of producing a-holes. I'm not sure I agree with him here - I think the interactional style of Israelis (with whom I work pretty extensively) tends to lead others to believe they're a-holes when they're not. And I suspect (although I have little direct experience to validate this hypothesis) that Japanese interactional styles lead Americans to conclude that Japanese are never a-holes when in fact some of them probably are - we likely just don't understand when a Japanese a-hole is being an a-hole to us.
The question of whether a-holes are begotten or made is further explored - Dr. James concludes that there is some genetic predisposition to a-holiness but that society plays a critical role in forming a-holes. He also comments on a-holes in positions of power. Discussed but left insufficiently explored, in my view, is whether a-holes naturally ascend to those positions, or whether the positions turn individuals into a-holes. This distinction becomes important for the political turn the book takes in the chapter "a-hole capitalism."
Dr. James' thesis is that an a-hole is characterized by feeling entitled to special advantages. In discussing a-hole capitalism, Dr. James turns his sights on those who could be viewed as directly or indirectly exploiting others; those who feel entitled to an ever-greater share of the pie. While not ever quite explicitly saying so, he clearly has the rich in mind, although I don't think he means to imply that being rich necessarily makes one an a-hole. And as I look around myself, I can clearly see that sense of entitlement among some of the powerful.
But interestingly enough, I think Dr. James' focus on entitlement strikes at the heart of the current political division in the United States. The left views conservatives as a-holes because conservatives feel entitled to the rewards they have earned through market mechanisms, even if those mechanisms have given them rewards that are disproportionate to any common sense justification. The right views progressives as a-holes because progressives feel entitled to lay claim to things that they have not themselves earned in the market. So in fact, each side views the other as a-holes because each feels the other is laying an unfair, "special" claim to entitlement.
Does this suggest a solution? No, not really. These competing views of entitlements are subject to quite a lot of analysis in academia, in the press, and around water coolers. But perhaps a good starting point for discussion would be with the injunction, "Don't be an a-hole."
All in all, I found Dr. James' book both amusing and thought-provoking, which is all I could hope for. He brings together some of what I've recently read of Stiglitz on inequality and Tomasi on free market fairness in a way that is arguably more coherent, and certainly funnier, than either of them.
36 of 41 people found the following review helpful.
Important common ground
By Cam
The first part of this book describes what an a-hole is and how one differs from a psychopath or an abrasive personality. I applaud the author's decision to use a colloquial term we all grasp intuitively for the pathology.
The second part of the book discusses dealing with a-holes, one-on-one and in a group dynamic. That there are no simple formulas for this serves as testament to the basic intractability of the a-hole.
The book makes a case that a-holes operate to the ultimate detriment of society. Hopefully the term a-hole (in its technical sense) becomes part of our common lexicon, for it appears that only as a social group can we counter a-holes.
As I write this review I see the spectrum of opinion is flat over the "hate it" to "love it" range. Reading the opinion of SOME of those who didn't like the book, I was struck by the vehemence of their dislike. The language employed by these pundits would seem to qualify them as a-holes. I wonder whether an a-hole would typically perceive the book as a personal attack and would perforce respond with unwarranted hostility?
See all 171 customer reviews...
Assholes: A Theory, by Aaron James PDF
Assholes: A Theory, by Aaron James EPub
Assholes: A Theory, by Aaron James Doc
Assholes: A Theory, by Aaron James iBooks
Assholes: A Theory, by Aaron James rtf
Assholes: A Theory, by Aaron James Mobipocket
Assholes: A Theory, by Aaron James Kindle
Assholes: A Theory, by Aaron James PDF
Assholes: A Theory, by Aaron James PDF
Assholes: A Theory, by Aaron James PDF
Assholes: A Theory, by Aaron James PDF
![, by Charles Dickens Oliver Twist In Plain and Simple English: Includes Study Guide, Complete Unabridged Book, Historical [Paperback]From](https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/blogger_img_proxy/AEn0k_vActt42wSyWZKWir2MEJuszRBrUU33aHgbr8OfrqhuQRyQrggO2mNx7HZxy7muxJf84KiCp9Qiwvf4GQH4v53vog28xRpxHXxjpH17H5ihmTni5k0UEq-8=s0-d ", by Charles Dickens Oliver Twist In Plain and Simple English: Includes Study Guide, Complete Unabridged Book, Historical [Paperback]From")
![[ Anthem's Fall Dunn, S. L. ( Author ) ] { Paperback } 2014, by S. L. Dunn](https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/blogger_img_proxy/AEn0k_v1uT7K9uiPEQ7H5J-f7tLFpzOZOsSFevL0dMDPJGQuJqrD8CkVLv3x6xaiBjJcerp_ojVjUYhWMTjhG-qu5xBCrJp9PG6lBZ4NWSDMQ0HmSuWX1cj5-cM=s0-d "[ Anthem's Fall Dunn, S. L. ( Author ) ] { Paperback } 2014, by S. L. Dunn")
![[ Anthem's Fall Dunn, S. L. ( Author ) ] { Paperback } 2014, by S. L. Dunn](https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/blogger_img_proxy/AEn0k_uLgJFDoC5Qh0Q0lR9o5ZtcIKF707yzYHyPYPmbaltB01qiyKyhizpuIoe188Z6mFnpQgQKffgvoXU6XZ9FVxxheiXix_Q=s0-d "[ Anthem's Fall Dunn, S. L. ( Author ) ] { Paperback } 2014, by S. L. Dunn")
![[ FUNDAMENTALS AND ADVANCES IN KNITTING TECHNOLOGY (WOODHEAD PUBLISHING INDIA) - IPS ] , by Ray, Sadhan Chandra ( Author) 2012 [ Hardcover ]](https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/blogger_img_proxy/AEn0k_tSNXdgxBJ7kc5_3ZF3U-TzH_-kdcPM9sl4xFdYY-_pnxmHuGzsDePMsy2m284J9N0y-eTpP95GmWtratXxeVNrIrcOuX9FKKPpVGqCcHK4Ox33DzRto6-W=s0-d "[ FUNDAMENTALS AND ADVANCES IN KNITTING TECHNOLOGY (WOODHEAD PUBLISHING INDIA) - IPS ] , by Ray, Sadhan Chandra ( Author) 2012 [ Hardcover ]")